Author: administrator

Winners Named for Automotive Innovation Awards Competition.

November 8, 2013 – On November 6, 2013 at SPE® Automotive Innovation Awards Gala, SPE Automotive Division named winners of 43rd Annual Automotive Innovation Awards Competition. Awards for most innovative use of plastics in ground transportation were presented for 8 categories: Body Exterior, Body Interior, Chassis/Hardware, Electrical Systems, Materials, Powertrain, Process/Assembly/Enabling Technologies, and Safety. Grand Award winner was also named at same event.
SPE® Automotive Div. Names Winners of 43-Annual Automotive Innovation Awards Competition

Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc
13 Church Hill Rd.
Newtown, CT, 06470

Press release date: November 6, 2013


TROY, (DETROIT) MICH. – For the 43rd year in a row, members of the SPE® Automotive Division’s board of directors and guests from the global automotive and plastics industries gathered to honor the year’s most innovative use of plastics in ground transportation at the SPE Automotive Innovation Awards Gala. Over 700 people attended the annual banquet on November 6, 2013, at Burton Manor in Livonia, Mich. to learn which applications in this year’s Automotive Innovation Awards Competition won awards in eight categories, and which category winner was also named the Grand Award winner, the most prestigious honor of the evening.

Winners survived a prequalification round as well as presentations before a panel of industry experts on September 26 and 27. Finalists from that round presented before a Blue Ribbon panel of judges on October 7, where category and Grand Award winners were selected. This year’s Body Exterior category winner was also voted the Grand Award winner. Other winners were as follows. Details on all of this year’s nominations will be found at

• OEM Make & Model: 2014 Nissan Motor Co. Nissan* Rogue* cross-over utility vehicle (CUV)
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. / Magna-Decostar
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: LyondellBasell & Advanced Composites, Inc. / Kyowa Industrial Co., Ltd.
• Material / Process: Hifax* TYC 1175P thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO, outer panel) & Mostran* L5091-P long-fiber thermoplastic polypropylene (LFT-PP, inner panel) / Injection molding
• Description: This liftgate is unique in that all materials are fully olefinic (hence, fully recyclable at end of vehicle life) and it features North America’s first TPO outer panel. The full assembly sports unique styling and is 30% lighter than comparable stamped steel systems, improving fuel efficiency by 10%. Lower weight also reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and facilitates customer opening/closing of the lighter liftgate. Thanks to parts integration, low scrap, and reuse of offal possible with injection-molded thermoplastics, raw-material costs on the outer panel were reduced 35% vs sheet-molding compound (SMC). Use of a high-flow, high-stiffness, high-impact TPO formulation reduced molding cycles vs. SMC and traditional TPO compounds for the painted Class A outer panel. Use of molded-in-color (MIC) LFT-PP met mechanical requirements and eliminated paint on the Class A inner panel, reducing VOC emissions. Both panels were joined via a structural adhesive for which they were formulated to have an affinity.

• OEM Make & Model: 2014 Chrysler Group LLC Jeep* Cherokee*sport-utility vehicle (SUV)
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Intertec Systems
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC / Windsor Mold Group
• Material / Process: Stamax* 30YK270 PP / Thinwall injection molding
• Description: This application represents North America’s first instrument-panel (IP) retainer molded at 2.0-mm walls in LFT-PP composite. Typical wallstock on conventional injection-molded olefin resin is 2.5-4.0 mm, meaning parts are heavier and have longer molding cycles. The 30% glass-reinforced (GR) LFT-PP resin provides required stiffness, strength, and impact performance to meet interior safety requirements at a great value. Thinwall molding helped reduce cycle times 30%, part weight 27%, and costs $3 USD/vehicle, contributing to better vehicle weight, fuel efficiency, and U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) targets. It also helped reduce plastics consumption by 2.5-million lb over the life of the program. Advanced fiber-orientation modeling was used to reduce warpage during mold design.

CATEGORY WINNER: Chassis/Hardware
• OEM Make & Model: 2013 Ford Motor Co. Ford* Fusion* & Mondeo* sedans
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Magna Exteriors & Interiors
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC / not stated
• Material / Process: Xenoy* 1103 polycarbonate (PC)/polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) / Injection molding
• Description: Globally, this is the first single-piece front bumper energy absorber (EA) that simultaneously meets the conflicting requirements of both Part 581 bumper damageability (which tends to require a stiff EA) and Pedestrian Protection GTR lower-leg impact (which tends to require a soft EA). By developing a common EA that meets both sets of requirements and is tunable, the need for different EAs, bumper beams, and bumper fascias in different geographies with different impact requirements is eliminated. The injection molded PC/PBT blend offers excellent energy absorption properties during deformation (up to 100% strain) while retaining its structural integrity from -30 to 60C. The patent-pending system reduces complexity in design, manufacturing, and assembly, plus improves pedestrian safety while lowering replacement costs during low-speed impacts. It is 40% lighter and 10% less expensive than steel EAs, and 20% lighter than thicker PP EAs at comparable costs.

CATEGORY WINNER: Electrical Systems (new category for 2013)
• OEM Make & Model: 2014 General Motors Co. Chevrolet*Spark* electric vehicle (EV)
• Tier Supplier/Processor: A123 Systems, LLC / Continental Structural Plastics
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Cytec Industries Inc. / Century Tool & Gage
• Material / Process: Vinyl ester / Compression molding
• Description: This composite EV battery enclosure was required to meet a number of severe performance requirements, including 30o offset-barrier, side-impact, and rear-barrier crash; 50 G impulse shock (X, Y, Z); post-crash package integrity; fire-resistance testing; 3-m drop testing (bottom/end); 1-m water-submersion test; and vibration/shock testing. To satisfy all criteria, new material, production process, post-mold finishing, and non-destructive test methods were needed. The result is industry’s first application of a volatile-organic compound (VOC)-free thermoset vinyl ester resin reinforced with a coarse basket-weave glass rove cloth to form a complex-shaped enclosure that protects the EV’s battery components in the event of a catastrophic event. The tough compression-molded composite is 40% lighter than metallic solutions, helping the vehicle achieve extended range and enhanced performance. Since it is non-conductive, it protects occupants and first responders to an accident scene. Specially formulated resin is free of styrene emissions, making it safer for workers and the environment. Selective pattern layups allow for localized reinforcement. The application also features a large structural joint of composite to steel.

• OEM Make & Model: 2013 Nissan Motor Co. Nissan* Sentra* compact car
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Calsonic Kansei Corp.
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Asahi Kasei Chemicals / Calsonic Kansei Corp.
• Material / Process: Sunvieo* A7171 thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) / Injection molding
• Description: This is the world’s first instrument panel featuring an injection-molded thinwall skin in ultrahigh-flow TPV. With a melt-flow rate of 250 g/10 min and excellent mechanical properties, this specially formulated material made it possible to mold a 1-mm skin that could accommodate the IP’s deep draws and uneven undercuts without tearing, thereby providing new levels of design and styling options. The TPV also provides superior visual appeal, distinctive elongation, and softer touch desired by consumers without compromising proper airbag deployment and function. Compared with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) slush molding, it offers good long-term appearance and gloss levels. Molded in a 60-sec cycle, the new skin material is 25% lighter and 10% less costly than PVC slush molding and also reduced tooling costs, plus scrap is reusable. Additionally, there also was a 58% CO2 savings vs. PVC slush molding since the process is less energy intensive. The skin’s good mold-release characteristics help minimize the need for mold-release spray, reducing volatiles further.

• OEM Make & Model: 2011 Audi AG Audi A4* & A5* sedans with 2.0L TDI & TFSI engines
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Röchling Automotive
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: ZEON Corp. / Röchling Automotive
• Material / Process: Polyamide (PA, also called nylon) 6 + alkyl acrylate copolymer (ACM, also called acrylic rubber) / Suction blow molding
• Description: This application combines the air-intake duct with charge air cooler and integrates both into the intake manifold, reducing air-intake loop volume by up to 50% (for better engine response) while also lowering package space 40% and part count, weight, and costs by 20%. The resulting system reduces pressure losses so turbine work is reduced while keeping the same boost pressure at air-intake valves and helping reduce pumping work in the turbocharger 10% at high engine loads. Novel production technology (suction blow molding) and a new high-performance soft TPV (PA 6 + ACM), which can withstand 2.7 bars of overpressure at 125C were used. There was no need to design in bellows on this part, since the material was able to decouple engine movements from the intercooler by itself, and no internal protection layer was needed to shield the material from exposure to acidic blow-by fluids. Unlike conventional rubber, the part is fully recyclable at end of life. This led to 50% direct and 50% indirect cost savings. Thanks to acoustic improvements, interior cabin noise also is reduced for occupants.

CATEGORY WINNER: Process/Assembly/Enabling Technologies
• OEM Make & Model: 2014 General Motors Co. Corvette* Stingray*sports car
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Globe Machine Manufacturing Co. / Plasan Carbon Composites
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Toray North America / Weber Manufacturing Technologies Inc.
• Material / Process: Epoxy carbon fiber prepreg / New out-of-autoclave molding process
• Description: This is the first production use of a new rapid out-of-autoclave production process for carbon fiber-reinforced composites. It produces parts with equivalent mechanical properties and better aesthetics far faster than the traditional autoclave (in 17 vs. 150 min). This significantly reduces costs and makes carbon composites practical and affordable for the first time for medium-volume automotive production. Key to this significant technology breakthrough was R&D characterization of the autoclave cure cycle and resin cure kinetics, which led to several patent filings, a 66% reduction in cycle time, a 30% reduction in direct part costs, and a 75% reduction in the cost of process consumables. Additionally, the specially designed process and equipment prevents the traditional exothermic cure reaction, eliminating the need for nitrogen blanketing and release of volatiles. Nickel-vapor-deposition (NVD) tooling with embedded hot-oil heating/cooling lines moves heat quickly through the Z-axis for rapid curing. A reusable silicone rubber canopy (good for 400-500 parts) reduces the cost and hassle of traditional disposable bagging. Parts exit the tool with more consistent surfaces, reducing finishing operations by 35%.

• OEM Make & Model: 2013 Ford Motor Co. Ford*Fusion* mid-size sedan
• Tier Supplier/Processor: Autoliv Inc. / Atlantic Precision Products
• Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Mitsubishi / Great Lakes Mold & Engineering
• Material / Process: TT914 CNP TPO / Injection molding
• Description: Replacing a conventional metal can and plastic cover, this is the first time that an insert-molded bracket/cover assembly has been designed to be both the mounting surface for the seat side airbag (SAB) as well as integral to the performance and cosmetic function of the cover. This unique design answered the challenge of meeting styling studio requests for a thin seat appearance, but providing packaging space for increasingly large side airbags, which now typically protect occupants from chest to pelvis. The insert-molded cantilevered metal bracket allows for efficient assembly at the airbag supplier, reducing part counts typically required for a Class A side airbag module and saving 300 g of weight. Extensive filling and tooling development was used to ensure proper bracket encapsulation by the tough TPO resin, which maintains a Class A appearance during normal usage, but delivers proper airbag deployment in a side impact event. The design also virtually eliminates craftsmanship fit concerns that can be an issue with conventional “can & cover” SAB designs.

SPE’s Automotive Innovation Awards Program is the oldest and largest competition of its kind in the world. Dozens of teams made up of OEMs, tier suppliers, and polymer producers submit nominations describing their part, system, or complete vehicle and why it merits the claim as the Year’s Most Innovative Use of Plastics. This annual event typically draws over 700 OEM engineers, automotive and plastics industry executives, and media. As is customary, funds raised from this event are used to support SPE educational efforts and technical seminars, which help educate and secure the role of plastics in the advancement of the automobile.

The mission of SPE is to promote scientific and engineering knowledge relating to plastics worldwide and to educate industry, academia, and the public about these advances. SPE’s Automotive Division is active in educating, promoting, recognizing, and communicating technical accomplishments for all phases of plastics and plastic-based-composite developments in the global transportation industry. Topic areas include applications, materials, processing, equipment, tooling, design, and development.
For more information, see and .

® SPE is a registered trademark of the Society of Plastics Engineers. All other trademarks* are the property of their respective owners.

ATTENTION EDITORS: High-resolution digital part photography for all of the 2013 nominations is available at

Media Contact:
Peggy Malnati
SPE Auto. Div. Comm. Chair
Phone: +1.248.592.0765

Metco Metal Finishing Announces New ISO Certification
The Lindgren Group – METCO Metal Finishing
3508 E. Corona Ave.
Phoenix, AZ, 85040
View contact information for this company

Press release date: April 13, 2011

Metco Metal Finishing, a division of the Lindgren Group, announces its new ISO certification. The company is now certified as ISO 9001:2008 compliant.

ISO 9001:2008 is a set of standards set forth by the International Organization of Standards. These standards provide a framework for a quality management system that ensures a company will provide quality products and quality customer service. It is a tried and tested framework for taking a systematic approach to managing the organization’s processes so that they consistently turn out product that satisfies customers’ expectations.

By achieving this certification, Metco Metal Finishing has shown that they:
o Meet or exceed the customer’s quality requirements
o Comply with applicable regulatory requirements
o Enhance customer satisfaction
o Aim to achieve continual improvement of the above objectives

“As our customer’s requirements continue to evolve, we will continue to invest in our systems to ensure we are exceeding their expectations,” said Michael Battaglia, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Metco Metal Finishing. “The sophistication of our industry and the markets we serve demand that we continue to build robust systems and the ISO 9001:2008 is a component of that strategy. You will see our company continue to make these investments in continuous improvement and quality systems as part of our strategy to serve our customers better than anyone else can serve them.”

For additional information, please visit or call Mike Battaglia.

About Metco Metal Finishing -
Metco Metal Finishing, Inc., a facility within The Lindgren Group, is a recognized leader in the Metal Finishing Industry. We offer chemical finishing, electroplating, mechanical finishing and laser part marking services. Metco is based in Minneapolis, MN.

About The Lindgren Group-
At the Lindgren Group, customer service is not a department; it is our culture at every level of the organization. The Lindgren Group is a management company in the Metal Finishing Industry with three locations: Nico Products, in Minneapolis, MN, Avtec Finishing Systems in New Hope, MN and Metco Metal Finishing in Phoenix, AZ. The Lindgren Group is a recognized leader in the Metal Finishing Industry providing chemical finishing, electroplating, mechanical finishing and additional value added services. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, MN. For more information and a comprehensive list of services visit their website at

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti. more


The Los Angeles Award Program has chosen General Plating Co. for the 2013 Los Angeles Awards in the Metal Finishing Manufacturers classification.

The following article was previously published on the blog

By Marko Duffy. This is how we platers think it goes…An engineer calls his co-workers over to his cubicle to show the latest device he’s created—an intelligent, innovative work of technological art. Wild celebration breaks out with engineers high-fiving and breaking out in the “Dougie” in excitement! As one engineer embraces the designer and sure winner of a patent and a magazine cover, he salutes him with: “And it will look amazing plated!” Of course it will. It will, right?
This is where our hero designer just adds a little plating here, a little chromate conversion coating there, a little anodize over there and maybe a touch of nickel here. Done! Now get it made—by Thursday!
You may as well have just walked into the owner’s office, removed his wallet from his pocket and helped yourself. The plant manager just lost a little more hair, and there’s a masker who just missed dinner with a friend because she’s the only one who could possibly stay and do this. But what the heck, the extra overtime hours will be huge!

So, that’s the BEST we can hope for?!?

Now, there is some masking that is very easy, such as plugging tapped holes, etc., and masking for paint or powder is less tricky than, say, for electroless nickel. But there is a lot of masking that—certainly from a finisher’s standpoint—seems like an afterthought or a deliberate attempt at sabotage.

What do I mean?

Some masking borders on nearly impossible. Masking something in the middle of a part by measuring dimensions from edges, masking the bottom of cavities, thin edges, awkward shapes and surfaces, etc.—the list is endless. How can this be avoided? Well, let’s start with a basic premise: give the plater some options.
I’m sure there are areas where you absolutely, positively, have to have a specific finish. And I’m sure there are areas where you positively cannot have that same finish. For instance, for reasons that are dimensional or electrical, for adhesion purposes, or for corrosion resistance. What I wonder is, are there areas where you really don’t care what finishes are there? A side wall to a cavity? Maybe the whole surface where there is a conductive pad going down? Maybe an area that tolerance is so wide open that the plater could mask plus or minus a half inch? If you thought about it, before the patent celebration breaks out in the cubicle, you probably could come up with something that would make it easier for the plater. Why not create a third note on the printout: “Plating on this surface is optional” or “Mask 0.75″ x 1.25″ minimum; 1.5″ x 2.75″ maximum.”

Anything like that is going to make the plater more money, let the plant manager keep his hair, and let the lead masker get out on time. And that, of course, is your ultimate goal. Congratulations—your extra effort made all of their lives better, and all it took was a few extra hours of design activity!

Oh, and by the way, the manufacturing cost just came down about $25 per piece in direct labor costs for the masking itself. And the plating lead time went from 10 days to 3 days. And the yield went up due to fewer rejects. Plus, the “on-time” rating just improved because complete orders were shipped due to lack of fall-out. Lastly, the soft costs of multiple shipments, extra shipping charges, more receivers and purchase orders, no corrective actions being written, no vendor visits to resolve quality issues and, gasp…no scrap being made and written off. Whatever your motivation, find a reason and make the effort. Put in the thought.

In the grand scheme of things, these issues are all secondary to performance. And these added costs are a relatively small price to pay for the right design. When necessary, you have to do what works. But there is always an opportunity to at least try to smooth out the supply chain and create some time/cost savings. The benefits are to all, and that’s where success and profit really lie.


Marko Duffy, CEF, is president of Marathon Manufacturing Services, LLC, Lawrence, Mass. An industry veteran with more than 20 years experience, Duffy has expertise in the following areas: anodizing, electroplating, painting/powder coating, fabricating, machining, and plant engineering. For more information about Marathon Sales’ products or manufacturing services, please call 508-904-8899, e-mail, or visit www

Do you need to blog about an industry issue? Contact the editor to submit your thoughts or ideas for review.